In the last thirty years there has been a very large shift in farmer sentiments towards shooters and access to their properties.
Unfortunately that has created a situation where highly responsible shooters are now lumped in with the nasty types of big city shooters that many farmers have had unfortunate and bad experiences with.
Quite a few years ago there were a number of court cases where farmers were sued by illegal trespassers when those trespassers injured themselves while trespassing on a property.
The trespassers won their cases in a few instances until the law was changed.
At one stage it appeared that any injuries from barb wire fencing would make a farmer liable for those injuries even when trespassers illegally entering the property for criminal reasons injured themselves while climbing over the barb wire fence.
The law was eventually changed but there is still considerable potential liabilities for the land owner and operator even if the intentions of the trespassers are to commit a criminal act.
Grossly biased laws and regulations from the OH & S that are heavily biased against owners / operators have not helped the owner / operator either.
The real problems started with the large influx of southern Europeans and middle eastern ethnic type migrants some 40 years ago.
In some of those European and middle eastern regions regions there are long held traditions now promulgated into laws that allow hunting across privately owned land.
These ethnic types from these regions just assume that they can and do come onto any private property here in Australia and can just start blasting away at anything and everything regardless and I am talking about wide open grain growing areas and paddocks.
Carloads of them just use to just drive anywhere onto a property and start blasting away.
They quite often became very nasty and threatening when ordered off the property
I personally have evicted a number of these "shooters" over the years.
All had the same standard lying answer, we asked the guy up the road there if it was alright to shoot here and he said yes!
Most go eventually but on a couple of occassions it became nasty and in one instance one of the group started to point a gun a me until one of the others jumped in front of him and screamed at him.
This was far from an isolated case as many neighbors have had similar experiences with ethnic types from the big city,
Melbourne in this case which is 300 kms away, where they were threatened when they tried to evict shooters who were trespassing on their properties.
In the 50's and 60's there were no real problems with shooters as they nearly always sought and got permission before shooting. They understood the land owner's situation as in those days nearly everybody still had some connection with the land as they all had relatives in rural areas or had some sort of rural experience or background so knew the psychology of land owning and and owners.
The sheer arrogance of some of these mostly southern European and middle eastern ethnic types when it comes to trespassing and shooting on properties is almost unbelievable.
In one local case, the farmer had not visited a somewhat distant paddock for a couple of weeks.
When he did so he found large commercially printed signs on the gate to the paddock ordering all other shooters away as this was reserved for shooting by a particular group, which is the first that the farmer knew about any shooting on his property.
After the Port Arthur massacre, the gun laws and particularly the law that requires written permission from the land owner / operator before somebody is allowed to shoot over the property has almost eliminated the ethnic and blast away trespassing type of nasty shooter as it has given a firm legal base and a good level of legal protection to the farmer against this type of activity.
The other big factor in reducing what was an increasingly serious problem for us farmers was the police pressure on the publishers of the ethnic news sheets to publicise just what the Australian and state legal requirements were for shooters and what the potential legal consequences were for trespassing and illegal shooting without written permission from the land owner / operator.
For my part while still farming, although not at all into shooting and hunting myself, I welcomed the local shooters and those I knew who were after foxes, rabbits, cats and similar vermin.
The introduction of these vermin into Australia is one of the biggest blights and reflections ever on the intentions and intelligence of those who persisted with these introductions in an attempt to make Australia just like Old England
I did not allow quail shooters and other similar game shooters as I like birds and other native animals and tried to protect them.
And don't call me an environmentalist as I detest the hypocrisy of most of them.
It is very unfortunate that those genuine and responsible hunters and shooters who are only hunting vermin, cats and introduced pests of all types should have been classed along with the arrogant, trespassing and often criminal and deliberately damaging, totally irresponsible mostly city origin shooters that have no affinity for rural areas nor any understanding of farmers or any respect for the rights of the farmers in protecting their property and ownership rights.
Unfortunately it is nigh impossible for a farmer to differentiate between the well intentioned shooter that he does not at all know and the irresponsible and casual shooting riff raff who have the potential to cause him much grief.
And even with the well intentioned shooter, while everything is going along OK then good but if something does wrong, often somebody who may appear in every way to be a reasonable and responsible person will turn nasty if they think that they can get some money to "compensate " them when things have gone wrong while they are on another's private land.
Oakey, I know exactly where you are coming from and I and I suspect a lot of farmers are sympathetic but in the end it is simply not worth the risk of losing your farm if you are sued by some out of nowhere shooter who has injured himself while on your property and decides that there is a nice little compensation package to be had if he sues you, the farmer.